Thursday, June 19, 2008

On Homophobia

Why is there such a vitriolic hate in some people against gays and lesbians? After all, people have all kinds of preferences, so why is this preference considered so hateful? I don't want to argue whether homosexuality is a genetic predisposition or if it is a after-birth preference. I only want to address the issue of homophobia. In many countries, including India, homosexuality is a crime under law. Why?


Firstly, it is clear that sexuality in human beings has evolved with reproduction as its function. The ejaculation of sperm in male orgasm and the menstrual cycle in the female are proof enough that sexual organs are to propagate genes by reproduction. Hence, the first charge against homosexuals is that of "perverting" (assuming they had a choice in the matter) a fundamental natural principle of the human body.

Secondly, since sex for homosexuals has no reproductive function, what function does it serve? Pleasure, of course. And sexual pleasure is anathema (hypocritically of course) to most conservative societies and religious groups. Homosexuals are therefore an easy target for the charge of sinful fornication and pleasure seeking.

Thirdly, in many patriarchal societies, young males are prized possessions. Their violation by elder males for sexual pleasure is considered a graver offense than the rape of a woman or of a young girl. If a young male is lost due to a sexually transmitted disease, or if he loses his "manhood" by becoming psychologically feminine due to sodomy, it is considered a great loss for the community. So also, an adult homosexual with effeminate behavior is considered an embarrassment for the male community in general, and one who is considered a liability and not an asset in case of conflict.

A woman who chooses to have only lesbian relationships is seen as an insult to the males whom (according to the males) she does not find desirable enough to have sexual relations with. This rouses much rage in a conservative patriarchal society.

Fourthly, there are various groups in society where cohesion exists because of the absence (or the assumption of absence) of sexual tension and sexual competition. Male clubs, fighting collectives (e.g. in the army or navy), female gossip groups (e.g. kitty parties), sexually segregated religious gatherings (e.g. in mosques, Sikh temples, Hindu temples, Christian churches, etc.) all assume that there will be no sexual complications in their gender-segregated groups. Once a person in such groups is known to be homosexual, he/she is shunted out because to keep him/her in the group will mean that others cannot relate to him/her as sexually neutral (they are also now the potential objects of his/her sexuality).

Fifthly, by the very nature of sex, one finds pleasure in mundane bodily fluids (saliva and sweat) and gender-neutral objects such as hair, hands and lips. This pleasure is associated with such fluids and objects because of the underlying gender of the other's body, and not because of the objects on their own. These fluids and objects are normally not considered attractive (they may in fact be considered repulsive) when observed in the person of someone of the same gender as oneself. Hence, the awareness that another person (having these unattractive or repulsive attributes) is looking at oneself with longing at some level, is enough to cause consternation and revulsion in heterosexual people. After all, males will frequently overlook a female's superficial attributes and have sex with her anyway because she is after all, a female and is attractive because of that important fact. On the other hand, it is extremely hard for a heterosexual male to tolerate, e.g. while in a conversation, even the flying specks of saliva of a moderately attractive male.

Sixthly, since society has established taboos against homosexuality at various levels, it is an open challenge to society and its stability for some people to rebel as far as sexual preferences are concerned. There are various taboos and restrictions on sex of all kinds, but one may still be able to hide sexual kinks insofar as they are had with a person of another gender. Having multiple partners is also permitted in various ways in many societies. But having a partner itself from the "wrong" gender is considered a grave wrong.

Seventh, since this is such a strong taboo, homosexuals grow up to have feelings of isolation, being repressed and being alienated. Sexual orientation for them becomes a focal point in their lives. "Coming out" becomes a big thing. Once out in the open, they wear their sexuality on their sleeve, as it were (it is debatable whether this is due to feelings of triumph, or due to an attitude of cocking a snook at society, or a consequence of just letting it all out after a long period of repression).

Frequently (this is only my opinion however, and I might be wrong), homosexuals seem to be very conscious of their sexuality, sexuality seems to occupy a large part in their lives and in their behaviour (more than normal people) and others cannot fail to notice it. Now even the so-called liberals, who have grown up to consider homosexuality as a tolerable form of behaviour, are outraged. It is one thing, according to them, to be homosexual, but quite another to be blatantly sexual, touchy-feely etc. even in normal social discourse. This is abhorrent to many who otherwise think homosexuality is in principle OK. This feeling, coupled with a guarded attitude lest one become an inadvertent object of the other's affections, leads most people to avoid homosexuals in social settings.

Eighth, homosexuals (especially males) are at increased risk of sexually transmitted diseases such as AIDS and an increased risk profile leads others to incorrectly see them as diseased already. Since most people are uneducated about the infection vectors of AIDS and other STDs, they avoid this high-risk category altogether, lest a handshake or the sharing of a toilet seat lead to some life-threatening illness.

Finally, homosexuals are stereotypically seen as flagrantly promiscuous and unwilling or unable to hold long term relationships, and this raises even more heckles in "normal" people (hypocritically of course). After all, they think, not only do you have to be "perverse", you have to exercise your perversity to the fullest extent possible, eh?

The end result is that homosexuals typically feel comfortable only in the company of other homosexuals. Hence the emergence of gay bars, clubs and such.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

I have a gay friend...I agree with your observations on "homophobia"...thank you

Free-Fallin' said...

very very apt observations ...i'm normally not one to be prejudiced against something that's obviously a very personal preferance, and could'nt care less, because it does'nt effect me in anyway, but blatant flaunting frankly offends my finer senses. it leaves a bad taste in the mouth.

Harkishan Singh said...

It appears you have taken into account the debate on the question as going on in the West.There are communities like the pathans where gays have always been in large numbers.Secondly while discussing the sex question in global context it will be more rewarding not to mix 3 categories of sex,love and marriage.Sex and reproduction also do not seem to be so closely related today.

Harkishan Singh said...

Sex in humans and animals does not seem to go the same way in as much as animals go for sex only in the mating season.Hence sex and reproduction are not congruent in the human situation.

harmanjit said...

I agree that humans use sex for both recreation and procreation, but still one has to accept that sexual organs are primarily designed for reproduction. Recreation seems to be a later development, serving emotional and hedonistic needs, for example.

dadi ma ke kisse kahani said...

A little more research will reveal that sex is indeed meant for recreation in some species including humans. But social, religious conditioning puts premium on its reproductive utility hence homosexual tendencies ( not resulting in progeny)have been labelled as unnatural. The same applies for other tendencies like sexual love for animals or other species. They are considered unnatural and hence the very articulation of such possibilities is an anathema.

The collective disgust or ridicule that the hetrosexual humans display towards the homosexual humans is somewhat similar to hatred one acquires towards the 'other' in any form: be it religion, color, country etc.

Because homosexuals are in minority and prevalent/dominant culture is heterosexual , that specific gay bars come up, which leads to further alienation of homosexuals.

As for Homophobia, the prejudice can run deeper than one understands. Try calling someone a gay and the response of that person will reveal if the person is indeed homophobic or not.

Most of the times it will be taken as an accusation and a vehement denial will follow as if being called gay is an invective of the highest order!!

Harmanjit Singh said...

"A little more research will reveal that sex is indeed meant for recreation in some species including humans."

# I disagree. Sexual intercourse has reproduction as its primary purpose. I am not dismissing the recreational aspect, only pointing out that procreation is what sex is primarily for (as far as nature is concerned).

"But social, religious conditioning puts premium on its reproductive utility hence homosexual tendencies ( not resulting in progeny)have been labelled as unnatural."

# Hmm.. It is unnatural in some sense, as the anal orifice does not provide lubrication, is tighter than vaginal opening, and contains feces which can lead to infection, not to mention a complete absence of procreative function.

"The same applies for other tendencies like sexual love for animals or other species. They are considered unnatural and hence the very articulation of such possibilities is an anathema."

# Though I agree that these are unnatural, as in not having procreation as the objective, I consider consensual homosexuality as pretty harmless and simply a preference. Bestiality etc. is complicated also because consent is hard to determine and evaluate in animals. It can be considered some form of torture/abuse to have sex with domesticated animals, who are in one's dominion, as it were.

"The collective disgust or ridicule that the heterosexual humans display towards the homosexual humans is somewhat similar to hatred one acquires towards the 'other' in any form: be it religion, color, country etc."

# True.

"As for Homophobia, the prejudice can run deeper than one understands. Try calling someone a gay and the response of that person will reveal if the person is indeed homophobic or not."

# Firstly, what is the intention behind calling someone as "gay"? Frequently, such an intention is questionable for being malice or sarcasm-free. Usually it is intended as a slight. Secondly, to point out someone's sexual nature or sexual preferences in public is just bad manners (whether one be straight or gay). Thirdly, to tell two straight men or straight women (or even a straight man and a straight woman) that they seem to have something fishy going on when they hug each other or have affection for each other may be preposterous and may invite a defense.


Most of the times it will be taken as an accusation and a vehement denial will follow as if being called gay is an invective of the highest order!!

dadi ma ke kisse kahani said...

Anatomical sex, which has all along been regarded as a given essence to human beings, is taken as the starting point for developing one’s identity. Sexual categorization provides the fundamental basis for constructing one’s identity. Thus, human beings always feel the need to categorize people into different categorizes -- man and woman, western and non-western, and so forth. “The notion of “sex” made it possible to group together, in an artificial unity, anatomical elements, biological functions, conducts, sensations, and pleasures, and it enabled one to make use of this fictitious unity as a causal principle...Michael Foucault